Blacks waiting for a liver transplant used to be more likely to die compared to whites. Now they have the same chance of getting a life-saving organ under a nationwide system that puts the sickest patients first, a new study found.
Racial differences disappeared when the old system was scrapped in 2002, according to the federally funded study, the first assessment of how Blacks fared after the change.
?By design, we tried to make it race blind. It looks like we did,? says Richard Freeman, M.D., a transplant surgeon at Tufts University School of Medicine in Boston, who helped create the new system and was not involved in the study.
But the research, in November?s Journal of the American Medical Association, suggests the system may favor men over women. Cynthia Moylan, M.D., the study?s lead author and a transplant fellow at Duke University Medical Center in Durham, N.C., called for more research on gender differences.
The nation faces a serious shortage of livers from deceased donors, with nearly 16,000 people now waiting. About 6,500 liver transplants were performed last year, but 1,602 people died waiting for a new one. Under the old system, which relied heavily on how long a patient spent on an official waiting list, sicker patients were passed over in favor of those waiting longer.
The system favored whites because Blacks join waiting lists when they are sicker. Why isn?t clear, but blacks may get treatment later or have poor access to liver specialists.
Compared to whites, Blacks on the waiting list had a 50 percent greater chance of dying or becoming too sick for transplant within three years, according to an analysis of five years of transplant records before the change. After the new system, called Model for End-Stage Liver Disease, or MELD, that difference disappeared. The new system is based on three lab tests. Results are combined as a score that predicts a patient?s risk of death within three months. Livers are allocated based on scores.
The change was made after the government ordered the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS), which runs the transplant network, to make liver allocation less arbitrary. Prior research has also found racial disparities in the allocation of kidneys. UNOS is currently evaluating its system for kidneys, which is now based on waiting time, blood type and tissue type.
The research compared adults on the waiting list during two periods: nearly 22,000 patients before the new system and nearly 24,000 patients after the scores were used. They took into account other risk factors for dying while on the waiting list.
Before the change, 810 Blacks, or 49 percent of those on the waiting list, got transplants. Meanwhile, 10,202 whites, or 52 percent of those on the list, got transplants. In the years after the change, 849 Blacks, or 47 percent, got transplants compared to 8,492 whites, or 42 percent.
For women, MELD wasn?t an improvement. The study found women had a 30 percent greater chance of dying or becoming too sick for transplant with the new scoring system. The gender difference wasn?t significant before.
Earlier research showed MELD improved waiting list death rates overall without hurting post-
transplant survival. The median wait time for a liver in 2007 was 18 months, according to the organ network. Regional differences in waiting list times are still a big problem, says J. Michael Millis, M.D., head of transplantation at University of Chicago Medical Center. Donated organs are
generally offered to local patients first. Some states with greater demand for organs have longer wait times.