To lure more users and advertising dollars, Facebook has increasingly assumed the role of a news organization by curating and publishing articles and to great effect. Four in 10 U.S. adults now get their news from the social media giant.
But with recent accusations that Facebook suppressed news from conservative-leaning outlets, the company is learning there are consequences to being everything to everyone.
The allegations laid out in Gizmodo stories earlier this month, citing unnamed former Facebook contractors, expose one of the countrys leading corporate juggernauts to political inquiries it would much rather ignore. They also raise questions about how Facebook designs and applies its algorithms, something its loathe to answer in the face of competition.
Last week, the U.S. Senate Commerce Committee sent a letter to Facebook Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg asking him, among other things, to provide a full account of how the company operates its trending topics feed a list of popular news stories, personalized to individual tastes, that appears in the upper right side of users Facebook pages.
Facebook must answer these serious allegations and hold those responsible to account if there has been political bias in the dissemination of trending news, Sen. John Thune, R-S.D., chairman of the Commerce Committee, said in the letter. Any attempt by a neutral and inclusive social media platform to censor or manipulate political discussion is an abuse of trust and inconsistent with the values of an open Internet.
Facebook holds itself up as a passive player in the media ecosystem, one that delivers articles, posts and videos to users based on the things they and their friends care about. People had always been involved in writing the largely secret software that defined care. But the launch of trending topics in 2014 pushed Facebook to increased human involvement in deciding what users would encounter.
The former Facebook contractors told Gizmodo that they were instructed to select articles from preferred media sites such as the New York Times, Time and Variety and downplay right-leaning news sites, conservative topics or news about Republican Party leaders.
In the wake of the allegations, some conservatives said they always suspected a bias on the part of the company and others said they never expected Facebook to be neutral. But plenty shamed Facebook for altering what the company had described as a level playing field that connects people to what matters to them most.
Facebook and social media have been championed as platforms without filters places where news and information can reach citizens directly, said Vincent Harris, a Republican media strategist and expert in digital campaigning. Facebook has already made it nearly impossible for nonpaid content to reach a users feed and now they want to act as a news god? Its a slippery slope.
Americans have gotten used to the idea that you go to certain news organizations for certain perspectives say, Fox News for a conservative viewpoint or MSNBC for a liberal point of view.
Facebooks entry into the news business is worth watching, not only because of its massive reach, but also because its unclear what responsibility it has to divulge political leanings if indeed it has them.
Theres an issue with transparency, said Kjerstin Thornson, an assistant professor at USC Annenbergs School of Journalism. They have a responsibility to tell us what kind of news provider they are. There is a skepticism around any news media. The difference is Facebook (isnt) telling us what the news is. Its trying to tell us what were talking about.
Facebook Vice President Tom Stocky refuted the allegations in a post last week, saying there were guidelines to ensure neutrality.
These guidelines do not permit the suppression of political perspectives, Stocky said. Nor do they permit the prioritization of one viewpoint over another or one news outlet over another.
Facebook isnt the first online destination to run into challenges presenting news.
Blogging service Medium, aggregation app Google News and many other platforms have also faced scrutiny over a lack of transparency. Stories appear on Google News based on computer-generated rankings, but humans help decide what sources are up for consideration.
Many more fast-growing apps want to become news sources too, which experts say will spur an increasing number of allegations of bias.