Administration to tweak mortgage modifications

Experts fear a new wave of foreclosures will hit this year as prolonged unemployment makes it difficult for millions of homeowners to pay their mortgages ? and many of them aren’t likely to get much help from a federal program aimed at keeping them in their houses.

Banks participating in the Home Affordable Mortgage Program, announced a year ago this week by President Barack Obama, have been slow to turn temporarily reduced mortgage payments into permanent ones.

“The overarching sense is that the mortgage modification process has not worked that well,” said Bert Ely, an independent banking consultant.

Obama administration officials admit the $75-billion program, which offers banks cash incentives to reduce payments, has had growing pains, and they said they are considering revisions to make it more effective.

Still, the program is expected to show continued progress when data from January is released Wednesday after a strong push by Treasury Department officials to get banks to make more of the modifications permanent.

For example, Bank of America, the nation’s largest servicer of mortgages, said Tuesday it had increased the number of permanent mortgage modifications to 12,700 last month from 3,200 in December. BofA said an additional 13,700 permanent modifications were in their final stage.

But that’s a drop in the bucket considering BofA holds about 1 million mortgages that are at least 60 days delinquent. About 4 million homeowners nationwide are 90 days or more delinquent on their mortgages or in foreclosure proceedings, according to Moody’s, which analyzes data from the credit reporting company Equifax.

Trial modifications and other delays have kept many of those mortgages out of foreclosure, but by the end of this year, 2.4 million borrowers are expected to lose their homes, said Celia Chen, a housing economist at That would be up from 2.1 million foreclosures and short sales last year and five times the annual numbers earlier in the decade.

It is unclear when those distressed properties would hit the market, but their large numbers are likely to push home prices back down this year, hitting bottom in the fourth quarter, Chen said. And that would make things worse for the 25 percent of homeowners who already owe more on their mortgages than their houses are worth.

The biggest blows will be felt in California, Florida, Nevada and other states where home prices have dropped the most and the ranks of struggling homeowners have swelled.

Despite an increasing number of foreclosure-prevention efforts, lawmakers and community advocates say they haven’t yielded the hoped-for results.

“Outreach isn’t happening,” said Hyepin Im, president of the Korean Churches for Community Development, a Los Angeles group that has sought to help hundreds of Asian-American borrowers who are struggling to avert foreclosure.

At the outset, banks didn’t screen borrowers before giving them trial modifications, she said. “Then at the end they don’t give very clear answers why they’re not getting permanent modifications. … There’s very little transparency.”

A report last week by Moody’s Investor Services called the Obama administration modification program’s impact “underwhelming.” But administration officials said it is on track to reduce payments for 3 million to 4 million homeowners through 2012.

As of Dec. 31, the program had helped get 787,231 home loans modified for three months and had helped make an additional 66,465 modifications permanent.

Officials noted that not all homeowners are eligible ? the program is only for owner-occupied homes, and excludes a variety of mortgages, including jumbo loans. And the administration continues to make changes, including a requirement added last month requiring homeowners to document their income before a trial modification is granted.

But the program continues to draw criticism. Banks have complained they’ve had trouble getting homeowners to provide the necessary documents. Frustrated homeowners have complained of bureaucratic runarounds from their servicers. Federal watchdog agencies have criticized the program. And last month the chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee announced an investigation.

(c) 2010, Tribune Co. Source: McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.